"If this is the case what was the WPKL doing sanctioning her for a World Title in the first place????"

Indeed Mr. Smit. That was the question which raised all this mess. But that is excactly what the WPKL official brought over his organisation with his remarks in presents of the Dutch press.
So whatever the WPKL would do afterwards would do harm to both fighters and the WPKL itself. Only way out is a rematch and hope and pray both camps will accept it is my guess.
You think Soumia is eager to fight WPKL after being insulted being too young and inexperienced to be "a worthy World Champion"??? You think Mary Hart is eager to fight WPKL after being stripped from a title???

It's easy now to hammer down WPKL for trying to make good on a impossible situation which was created by one of their chief officials.(probably even with best intentions to comfort, and not realizing what he said). Fact is the jury was disqualified with his words. So the fight itself isn't even relevant anymore. That's the whole point of this mess.

It's not about Mary Hart nor Soumia. Both girls did great. Both on very poory preps. Hart on short notice indeed and Soumia just back from a filmshoot in Bangkok. I've had a great evening watching the fight. Think everybody present did. That is not the point. Fight is available on DVD, so please judge yourself.

This is a WPKL matter and doesn't reflect on any of these two great fighters.
This is about a SB which screws up bigtime and "if" and "how" they try to fix it. Whichever way they choose, they can't make this right. Even if they had done nothing it would be damaging. It's an impossible choice between evils.
Their choice of having the fight reviewed might even have been a good and logical idea on paper........