NOTICE:
The version of Internet Explorer that you are using is outdated and not officially supported by this site. We heavily suggest upgrading to a more modern browser using one of these links: Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari or Google Chrome. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact us.
NOTICE:
Currently, you have Javascript disabled. Many of the features on this site require Javascript in order to function. It is highly recommended for you to enable Javascript in order to use this site to its fullest. For more info, please contact us.
The Ax Forum
Muay Thai & Kickboxing Forum Mixed Martial Arts Forum Boxing Forum Fight Training Forum Off Topic Forum
Help Center Forum Rules New Account Registration
Topic:Report Post to Moderators
Back to : Forum

The purpose of this form is to allow users to assist the moderation in maintaining the forum by reporting posts that are breaking the rules. You should only report posts that appear to be breaking one of the forum rules. This feature should NOT be abused. If we feel someone is abusing this feature, we will moderate their account accordingly.

The identity of users who report posts are not divulged during the moderation process.

The post that you are reporting is shown below the form. If this is not the post you intended to report, then click back and report the appropriate post.

Your Ax Name:
Your Password:

What rule is this post breaking?



EricR
Posted: 2006-05-23 17:53:50
Of course with pleasure Dave. If you don’t ban me from certain topics you put me to work  Good to see you again. LOL too.

+++PROTEST
1. Protest kan alleen schriftelijk, vergezeld van een videoband, worden aangetekend, en wel binnen 14 dagen na datum van gevecht.
2. Protesen met een une anieme uitslag (3 juryleden) worden niet behandeld.++++

Protest:
1. Protest can only been done in writing, accompanied by a videotape, at special (personal) mail delivery(don’t know the term) within max 14 days after the fight.
2. Protest of a unanimous decision will not be taken in consideration.

But, the WPKl statement made last Friday says:

++++++Na afloop van het titelgevecht is een protest ingediend door team Soumia.

In de bestuursvergadering van de WPKL op 9 mei 2006 is, ondanks verdeeldheid onder de bestuursleden en de unanieme juryuitslag, besloten het protest in behandeling te nemen.
Na twijfels van het team Soumia aan de onpartijdigheid van sommige juryleden door onderlinge strijdpunten, heeft het Bestuur onderzoek gedaan en dat is reden geweest om het protest in behandeling te nemen+++++++

After the fight Soumia’s team filed a protest.

At the WPKL meeting May 9th 2006, even though there was disagreement between the members and the fact it concerned a unanimous jury decision, members decided to address the protest.
Doubts expressed by team Soumia concerning the objectivity of some jury members because conflict made the board decide to do research. Outcome of this research gave reason to indeed address the protest.

Hope I translated it well Dave. Did it as best I could. 
Bottomline is they are bypassing the rules you made me translate from their WPKL rules and make it special circumstances. This because apparently the protest doesn’t address the fight itself (at least that is what I make of this statement), but it challenges the credibility of some of the jury members. And after doing research to that they claim to have sufficient evidence for taking the protest into consideration. (Which of course isn’t very hard I guess since i.e. this story made “De nieuwe Revue” which is one of Holland’s biggest selling weekly magazine because of the presents of the reporter I mentioned before in this topic. LOL).

Create Topic

Username:
Password: Forget your password?
Topic name:
Create in:
 

Search Forum

Search topics for keywords: