NOTICE:
The version of Internet Explorer that you are using is outdated and not officially supported by this site. We heavily suggest upgrading to a more modern browser using one of these links: Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari or Google Chrome. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact us.
NOTICE:
Currently, you have Javascript disabled. Many of the features on this site require Javascript in order to function. It is highly recommended for you to enable Javascript in order to use this site to its fullest. For more info, please contact us.
The Ax Forum
Muay Thai & Kickboxing Forum Mixed Martial Arts Forum Boxing Forum Fight Training Forum Off Topic Forum
Help Center Forum Rules New Account Registration
Topic:Report Post to Moderators

The purpose of this form is to allow users to assist the moderation in maintaining the forum by reporting posts that are breaking the rules. You should only report posts that appear to be breaking one of the forum rules. This feature should NOT be abused. If we feel someone is abusing this feature, we will moderate their account accordingly.

The identity of users who report posts are not divulged during the moderation process.

The post that you are reporting is shown below the form. If this is not the post you intended to report, then click back and report the appropriate post.

Your Ax Name:
Your Password:

What rule is this post breaking?



dan
Posted: 2006-05-25 21:10:48
Everytime I look at this long emotional thread on my board and also on this board,it seems reasons for the protests are being advanced other than simply that Soumia disgagreed with the first panels' decision.

If I now understand correctly, the *real* reason the protest was made
(and taken into consideration by the WPKL Chairman) was because of what the WPKL chairman himself said after the fight.

And the suspicion of Soumia's management that the wpkl chairman's after the fight comments revealed a bias against Soumia by the WPKL, and that this bias by the Chariman, then influenced the first judges towards a pre-fight bias
which calls into question the first three judges' integrity and objectivity.

Therefore, since the first jurors were possibly biased, new jurors had to be empaneled; and the fight had to be judged again by tape replay with unbiased jurors.

Is that a fair characterization of the reasons for the protest?




Create Topic

Username:
Password: Forget your password?
Topic name:
Create in:
 

Search Forum

Search topics for keywords: