As a relative newcomer to the sport could you enlighten me and say what politcs are involed here? I'm not looking to cause trouble here but seems that many seemingly vacuous statememts about the lack of judges imparitality exists. Could I ask where the evidence of this imparitality is? Seems like what I saw was consistant with Muay Thai scoring (from my limited understaning).

I've been to shows where the accused judges have judged and their decisions seemed to be in line with explanations. For my own understanding could someone explain why the decision was incorrect according to rules and scoring criteria that I have read in articles in such as those that appeared Fighters magazine (for example)?