One of the first things that has to be accepted before we can go further is that just because somone has been involved in Muay Thai for ex number of years in the Uk does not mean they know diddly squat about judging Muay thai as it should be judged. just because A B and C agree and they ahve been agreeing for 20 teays doesn't mean they have got it right.

I've ben invlovled in Muay thai for 22 years, and I learnt the proper way to judge two years ago! Or should I say I accepted the proper way to judge two years ago! I had heard it said and even been on a course organised by a Master Sken with a Muay Thai judge from Lumpinee, but at the time his explanition were so in contrast to what I was learning that I couldn't accept them. It took a while and some research of my own before I accepted them.

I think if peole were to say they deisagreed witht eh judges fine, but to come on and say that the judges were baised, or influenced by others is to accuse very well respected people of either Bias or incompetence. And the result of that is that well repsected, well trained, knowledgable people are going to think twice before accepting an invitation to judge!

By creating the way you are, you are in fact atempting to influence the future judging of these officials. It may not be your intention, but it is a possible result of an action.

And the only people complaining are from the camps involved