Topic:Report Post to Moderators
"There are 5 points in a round. The best boxer will get full 5 points, and his opponent is reduce \ cede by 4?, 4, 3?, 3 accordingly, and not to give points as 4? or 4 1/3.
In the draw round, he will get 5 points each.
The loser in the not clear round will get 4? points, the winner gets 5 points.
The loser in the clear round will get 4 points, the winner will get 5 points.
The loser that has clearly seen all the round, with least opposition, fallen down and scramble up again and is counted will get 3? points, the winner gets 5 points.
The loser who has done for through the round and is counted twice in one round will get 3? points, the winner gets 5 points.
The giving of points will be considered according to the following rules:
Any boxer uses Muay Thai weapons (fist, Kick, Knee, elbow) according to the rules, against his opponent more is the winner.
Any boxer uses Muay Thai weapons against his opponent severely, clearly, violently, badly injured at most important parts is the winner."
The ? where it says 4?, 4, 3?, 3 is 1/2 (half) I think its just the English translation from Thai that doesnt show it properly. 5 points with 1/2 point increments is the same as 10 points with a full point increment.
Each round is just as important as the other and if you fight to win each round it doesnt matter how its scored. But experienced fighters will pace the fight differently in different rounds knowing that the opponent is likely to be more or less dangerous at different points of the fight. Its just that 9 times out of 10 early rounds will be closer so less likely to justify a full point difference. No judge should automatically score the first 2 rounds 10/10, it just that they often are.