The version of Internet Explorer that you are using is outdated and not officially supported by this site. We heavily suggest upgrading to a more modern browser using one of these links: Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari or Google Chrome. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact us.
Currently, you have Javascript disabled. Many of the features on this site require Javascript in order to function. It is highly recommended for you to enable Javascript in order to use this site to its fullest. For more info, please contact us.
The Ax Forum
Muay Thai & Kickboxing Forum Mixed Martial Arts Forum Boxing Forum Fight Training Forum Off Topic Forum
Help Center Forum Rules New Account Registration
Topic:Report Post to Moderators

The purpose of this form is to allow users to assist the moderation in maintaining the forum by reporting posts that are breaking the rules. You should only report posts that appear to be breaking one of the forum rules. This feature should NOT be abused. If we feel someone is abusing this feature, we will moderate their account accordingly.

The identity of users who report posts are not divulged during the moderation process.

The post that you are reporting is shown below the form. If this is not the post you intended to report, then click back and report the appropriate post.

Your Ax Name:
Your Password:

What rule is this post breaking?

Posted: 2012-07-26 22:14:44
Clearly Vinnie and Michael were doing the commentary on a different fight to the one the judges were watching.
How can 2 such well resepcted men read the fight so different to 2 of the judges?

I noticed that in round 2 they refere to the extra padding in Levin anklets.
Does anyone know what it was?
I have heard it described as a plastic insert. Someone else said it was hard rubber compound.
I know the ref has said sorry for missing it from the start but I notice that following its removal Levin almost stops kicking. Infact from that point he throws less than 10 kicks in the following 3 plus rounds.
Clearly what ever was tucked in there was illegal as it was removed?
I'm asking this not because Levin was clearly cheating and not penilised in anyway for it but just to clarify the rules.
Also has the article been seized?
I would suggest that that alone could of been subject to an appeal to officials/organisation bodies..

Create Topic

Password: Forget your password?
Topic name:
Create in:

Search Forum

Search topics for keywords: