farhad,

ok, i understand your feelings,ideas well...may be also that i have exchagerated the subject a bit...when i told that fc is not tough ,it was compared with mt and kb...the simplest proof is the difference between recuparation, recovary times of styles...after a challenging fc fight a couple of days may be ok, but after an mt fight you need at least 5-6 days to walk properly...

i understand you well since we had also those complicts during late 1980's...fc was born in the usa and offered to the world through media, magazines a lot...we have been also influenced a lot and tried for a while this discipline,as well...however,we have been lucky and had the influences from holland (via turkish fighters) and could make the comparison well even at that times ...of course, at that times there was a confusion even in holland ...modified mt was announced as kickboxing (this is another story) ...you are lucky since today the seperation lines between disciplines are well described...however, at that time we could be sensitive only with our own experiences,orientations ..by the way, as you would easily see the former fc organizations converted their names to "kickboxing" and nowadays most of them has taken "mt " under their umbrella and the next step would be easily that they convert their names to "mt organizations"!..(of course, it is not easy and seems to be impossible...) why did they behave so?: simple :" 90% of people who trained for a while mt will stay in this dscipline and forget the former one...the magic behind is also simple :" satisfaction!.."

cheers,

hence,