Tony,

"OK, I am not going to argue with anyone, I have discussed this with Brian and merely think it would be a better place without the timewasters who make silly comments about fighters, shows & promoters. need I say more?"

As far as I`m aware, this is a discussion, not an argument. How about elaborating on your point? Why do you think there is a connection between "timewasters who make silly comments about fighters, shows & promoters" and all anonymous posters?
Again, there are 2 issues being confused here- the issue of problematic posters and the issue of the principal of anonymous posters.

"if we was all verified members then we could take a few people more seriously, I have my doubts about a few people on here, but I avoid them, and do not mention names so as not to cause a problem,"

Who do you refer to when you say "WE could take a few people more seriously"? Who is WE? Are you speaking for everyone or yourself? If you are speaking for everyone who nominated you as the spokesperson? I certainly did not and I do not fail to take someone seriously merely on the basis of an anonymous ID.

"I would like Ax verfied but as I said I have my own reasons, just a few are above."

I still don't see any explained reasons in your post. My previous posts still apply.

"Enough said, I have put my 2 p in.
Satankid, how you can classify the above post as a bullying tactic is silly!"

It is silly because.....? Again, please elaborate. Aggresively telling someone that you are right and they are wrong simply because you say so is bullying tactics, don`t you think?

"And you do not cut mustard, you dip your knife in and spread it or or dollop it on your food.
Tony"

I was using a popular metaphor, not speaking literally. I appologise if I was not clear enough. However, that was not the subject of the sentence, anyway. I will put it another way- Being unable to back up your standpoint, or even attempt to, in a discussion means that the discussion cannot progress. Those who disagree with you cannot understand why you propose what you do, therefore different points of view cannot be considered. If this is the case then the discussion will grind to a halt and it will devolve into a case of 2 different groups simply declaring that they are right and the other is wrong. Therefore nothing can be resolved, ultimately, in terms of an understanding.

But since you have declared your intention not to back-up your standpoint, what you say should not have any bearing on the outcome.

Satankid