Aaron, i'm not critiquing you guys... you were there and i wasnt. i only saw it from the comfort of my lounge.. and obviously things are different at ringside.
Yes Aaron, youre right re my scorecard not utilising the .5. Like i said "For what it's worth" As I mailed to Rexy last night, my score for Pixie v Jordan was incorrect, as i typed it in wrong, it was also the only round that i used a half point.... 28.5 - 28 to Pixie. Which is obviously contrary to your score... which is why there are three judges.

My comment was as follows:

"Way I hear it is that Jason won the first extension round on all the judges cards, but that is second hand info. Maybe the judges could tell us all which way they went"

That was not to say that the judges buggered anything up, I was questioning why 3 experienced judges, who are there to do a job that they are well adept at doing, were over-ruled? And, it would appear from the commentary here, on more than the one occasion that I bring up.


Sad that three judges opinions (reflected in their scorecards) dont amount to anything.

Mike Angove: "That is not the judges fault nor the promotors - it is a K-1 international issue as it is their rules"

K-1 international did not disregard the three judges decisions.

Dixon: "After some deep thinking I have decided to nominate a person who will sit in a seperate room with a monitor without commentary and make the final decision if required by the judges in the event of a draw."

So was the 1st extension in Jason/Chrisopholides a draw???. If not, there was no need to adjucate on anything.
If it was a draw, then what is Aaron talking about???(quote "at the end of Jason and Chris 4th Round all the judges had it 10, 9.5")..... I heard second hand from someone who viewed the cards who backs Aarons comment regarding this!!