"Crusade"??... you mean a desire for things to be fair and equitable for all parties. I guess I have given up yeah Scotty.... why fucking bother man.

Obvious irregularities have been aired, and no solid answers have been forthcoming. Rules were altered or ignored to suit on the night, ( Article 6:2,Articles 27 and 28) Experienced judges were overruled with utterly no explaination. This is not speculation - this is fact. Yet no-one seems to give a rats arse.

My queries are met with half an answer, my motives have been questioned... seemingly by those who have something to protect.

Alex Wong, PTB have not even been given the courtesy of a response of any type.

People speak of needing transparency and professionalism, yet become a part of the sideshow without standing up. I feel a deep empathy with fighters who are set to fight to a set of rules, and have the rules altered/ignored. I feel for judges who honourably score as they see it, based on years of experience, then get hung out to dry.

The thing is that this is not new. There was comment about the shows last year which had some irregularities levelled at the judges. Was that justified in light of the adjudicator overriding the judges decisions in this show?

There are rules provided... why are they not followed? Pretty simple really.

The question was asked "Where was Terry Hill".... well where was Brett Semple, Brett De'arth, Norm Graham, Al Hemuli.... theyve all been involved in the past, were they not wanted, or did they not want to be there? Who knows.

Well done Scotty in pushing my buttons to get the thread rolling again.... hehe.

Might see you at the "bash at the beach".... which i wont be judging at this time round.... why? Because last time the ref announced a split decision when all three judges deemed the bout was a draw, therefore I refuse to be a part of it. Sound familiar?