NOTICE:
The version of Internet Explorer that you are using is outdated and not officially supported by this site. We heavily suggest upgrading to a more modern browser using one of these links: Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari or Google Chrome. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact us.
NOTICE:
Currently, you have Javascript disabled. Many of the features on this site require Javascript in order to function. It is highly recommended for you to enable Javascript in order to use this site to its fullest. For more info, please contact us.
The Ax Forum
Muay Thai & Kickboxing Forum Mixed Martial Arts Forum Boxing Forum Fight Training Forum Off Topic Forum
Help Center Forum Rules New Account Registration
Topic:Report Post to Moderators

The purpose of this form is to allow users to assist the moderation in maintaining the forum by reporting posts that are breaking the rules. You should only report posts that appear to be breaking one of the forum rules. This feature should NOT be abused. If we feel someone is abusing this feature, we will moderate their account accordingly.

The identity of users who report posts are not divulged during the moderation process.

The post that you are reporting is shown below the form. If this is not the post you intended to report, then click back and report the appropriate post.

Your Ax Name:
Your Password:

What rule is this post breaking?



MarkCr
Posted: 2005-05-11 22:11:10
I take on board your comments guys... and yes, you are all correct, it isnt easy. Who of us hasnt sat for 14 fights in a row with no breaks and started to find our concentration waning. Points well stated.


"In the case that a fighter gets cut from a headbutt and is bleeding, the fighter who caused the other to get cut shall recieve one (1) point reduction, even if the headbutt was not intentional"

If i fly off the handle with no good reason then I apologise (esp to you Dixon). But the VIDEO was used to determine the cause of a head butt where one fighter WAS bleeding. It was ruled accidental... but no point was deducted. I'm bloody confused. You had the luxury of the TV, and used it.

As with the case for overruling the Judges in Jasons fight
"the supervisor and supervisory staff are allowed to review a video of the fight WITH THE OTHER JUDGES and confer whether the judgement has been made precisely. However, MORE that two voters must claim for the reconsideration of the judgement to review the fight. The referee will announce RECONSIDERATION during or immediately after a match............."

Can anyone spot what didn't appear to happen here? The avenue was there for the above to take place.

I'll state it again.... Dixon puts on the best show in town, I agree. And again I applaud him (you) for it. I certainly couldn't organise such an event.

Perhaps I get over done in my passion for the martial arts and my fervour gets the better of me when I see something that I dont think is correct(Oand i admit, that just becuse I think something is wrong, doesnt mean it is, it's merely my perspective). If i do overly jump up and down, again I apologise.

In this case, there are anomolies that I see and it bugs the shit out of me. Things are there, simply in black and white, and yet when I and others ask questions, we get no straight answers.

Again, to ask Mr Wongs question: Why was the Slowinski/Rony match called a split, when it's apparant that it was a unanamous dec. Was one judge wrong?

Dixon.... you win.... I give up. (hands up in surrender... waving a white towel)

For those who have mailed me.... cheers for the support, but it's time to speak for yourselves.

Create Topic

Username:
Password: Forget your password?
Topic name:
Create in:
 

Search Forum

Search topics for keywords: