Kahstallion...you started with some valid points, but went side track toward the end of your post. e.g. You mentioned. "The point is not about neautrality but making money". You may have a point there as neautral doesn't always mean fair, but ask any fighter or trainer in regard to judging and I guarantee they would prefer neutral judges. My point is, running an event, yes as you do a lot of hard work and a lot of stress behind the scene and need to make money for your trouble. Judging part of the event, no. You need to have neautral judges to be fair to fighters and trainers involve, to gain their trust and respect for the future.

I think Dixon and Terry both want neutrality. I think they may have some disagreement on conditions. Only them can explain. If they choose to, I'm sure we'll get to hear it direct from them.