I always wonder when there are such two strong opposing views. To me its obvious that the soy people have a lot to gain or loose. Those against soy don't generally seem to be giving and alternative... whats thier motivation?

Maybe I'm missing something but I think sources like The Price-Pottenger Foundation are thier to promote health.

The soy people are there to sell soy.

Maybe there is a finacial gain somewhere for someone and they have tricked some of the great researchers with studies... But I don't think as of yet.

I just took a nutrition course not so long ago and a couple things we were taught.

About 70% of soy is geetically engeniered (better get organic to be safe then cause thats a whole other ball of wax)

Obviously the estrogen like compounds will be mentioned many places. But we were specifically warned about soy baby products.

We were also taught a little about trisin inhibiters -stops break down in protein and messes up thyroid gland

also contains mineral blockers..

People that make money from getting results I tend to listen to before any study.

You only get to charge $500US/hr to make someone healthy from getting results or you'd go out of buisness fast.