1-that many conflicting studies do you go with your belief?? Scary.. I suggest looking at the sources

2-soy and infants vs cows milk and infants was mentioned a s a study. One cows milk isn't all its cracked up to be for babies. Two-what was the quality of the cows milk???? Was it dead processed garbage that is not fit for human consumption or was it raw and alive? Were the cows healthy? Were they fed what they are suppose to eat (GRASS!!! not corn-even organic corn, and grains). Were they pumped with antibiodics?? etc etc

A test like that might possibly show the lessor of two evils. But unless it looks at the quality of the cows milk(which isn't best choice IMO) then the study means nothing.

there are no numbers with refferances lol

Japan study-US study, different results. WHO got the study going? WHO paid for it? etc

3-countries were soy is consumed are healthier.. They consume it differently. That is like saying dairy and one country eats cheese and another drinks whey protein shakes. The former has raw cheese and the latter, the whey comes from MOnsanto injected animals fed grains and poisons.

The amounts these countries eat it in is less and its made differently. Eat it like they do and you might be doing alright. The good stuff they they eat in SMALL amounts isn't that common and isn't infant formula, soy milks or soy shakes or large scale fake meat stuffs.

When there is that much contriversy one has to wonder. There is alot of money to be made on it.

A good rule of thumb-how much did your ancestors eat 10,000 years ago?

Most people don't digest it well at all.