This last fight had nothing whatsoever to do with the first WPKL fight.
This was a tournament of eight fighter, and had nothing to do with WPKL.

Too bad only this fight is posted because Soumia also fought Naranjo and Yeitsidou that same night and won the tournament.Hart was only the first fight of that evening and as the tape says a split decision.

As for the WPKL story. It's history, and one can only hope all SB's in the World have learned something out of it. Sceptical as I am, I very much doubt it, since I already witnessed worse things since and fear this will keep happening untill this sport comes to 1 SB. As long as there are more SB's then Churches in this World I fear corruption, cover-ups and screw-ups will keep happening.

I do however not agree with the simplefied version Dan wrote earlier in this topic.
I think the words of a chairman of an SB (not just "some official" but the Bill Gates of the compagny) reflex the vision of his SB. These kinds of positions in a SB carry responsibility. It would be too easy to dismiss him as "just an official" and take his words like those of the village idiot.

And I don't think age and inexperience should be standards used to judge a World Title fight. If those standards apply, just don't let them do a WT fight.
With the proof Soumia's former management had on tape I think they had every right to protest this jury. Of course it's up to the SB how to handle it, but that is a different matter. If this jury has something to complain or feels falsely accused, they should take it up with their chairman. He brought it up for them and he put them in this position. Not Soumia's former management.