YOUR FIGHT CARD AS IT IS SO FAR.
FIRST ROUND
ANDREW PECK 1 v CHARLIE SMILER 8
PETER SAMPSON 2 v FELISE LENIU 7
STEVE McKINNON 3 v JASON RETI 6
v LEAMY TATO 4 ERIC NOSA 5

moving right along...Lets suppose there are no surprises and the top four really are on form and win their fights.
SEMI FINALS
ANDREW PECK 1 V LEAMY TATO 4
PETER SAMPSON 2 V STEVE MCK 3
once again assuming no surprises..
THE FINAL.
ANDREW PECK 1 V PETER SAMPSON 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A LEVEL PLAYING FEILD STILL USING YOUR RANKINGS BUT A FAIRER method.
ANDREW PECK 1 v ERIC NOSA 5
PETER SAMPSON 2 v JASON RETI 6
STEVE McKINNON 3 v FELISE LENIU 7
LEAMY TATO 4 v CHARLIE SMILER 8

moving right along...Lets suppose there are no surprises and the top four really are on form and win their fights.
ANDREW PECK 1 V STEVE McKINNON 3
PETER SAMPSON 2 V LEAMY TATO 4
once again assuming no surprises..
THE FINAL.
ANDREW PECK 1 V PETER SAMPSON 2

There is no worries with clubmates fighting, or anything else making this fight cards line up being seen as favoring one fighters journey to the final.Remember its about equity and transparency,and all with no harm done that may affect the TV entertainment dollars form a promoters point of view.The only fighter this affects is the otherwise ranked favorite,and that just ensures it isnt a staged or carefully crafted storyline which has no regard for the other fighters.not that i think that is the case,but we must be seen to be transparent in times like these dont we Dixon.Just because its for the fighters first and foremost still,isnt it dude. Im on your side concerning this,and i salute you!