My experience is they are repeatable and I have done blind testing.

The rice one is pretty simple. You could do in a lab and take notes ever 25 minutes. but basically you put cooked rice in a two jars, write on them, and see what happens. I wouldn't put them too close together but i would also make sure you put them in the same place, close to each other keeping the environment as much the same as possible.

In terms of muscle testing. I have used it almost daily for months and use it routinely with clients.

If yo want a scientific mind explaining and teaching muscle testing I recommend Dr David Getoff's DVD's on muscle testing... 6 or 7 of them. This guy is extremely left brained and very much by the book.

He is a skeptic of many forms of muscle testing that are, in his words, "not scientific" such as surrogate muscle testing (which proves very consistent in my experience).

I have muscle tested with a toxin (cell phone for example). The person being tested and myself do not know when the cell phone is placed close to their body (someone behind them). Phone comes close - subject weakens.

I have put different products in film canisters also. If memory serves I remember using nutrasweet, sugar and stevia in one test and different types of water and milk in another (processed and raw). No one knows which are which. test, mark results and them look what is inside.

Consisitent results.

In terms of Emoto style I have also written words on paper, put in envelops and had random ones handed to the subject when I tested them. no one knowing the content.

Consistent results.

It is possible for people to test weak to love and strong to hate. If reversals are corrected before testing i have yet to see someone test backwards. If the test shows up backwards and the reversdal done then they test normal.

You cannot reverse from "good" to "bad" so its not a matter of simply switching to get the desired result.

If you wanted to be sure sure you simply reverse all before the test.

However it is relatively rare to get backwards results to poisons like aspartame or sugar and decent quality water.

It is possible for someone to be reversed on all results...meaning they would test weak when they say the truth (like name) and strong with a lie (false name).

This is why you always calibrate the test with a known.

Just like checking a scale with a known weight before weighing anything else.

If you get clear results on true and false with name you are usually good to go.

There is an art and practice to making sure you are getting clear responses. Anything unsure should simply not be counted as you always want solid responses to base anything on.

If you want to see how energy flows through people line up 5 people (10, 20 doesn't matter - I do this at workshops). Have them all touch. At one end of the line you muscle test and you ask questions of the person at the other end of the line. Have one end state their name and them muscle test the other end. then have them say "my name is George Bush" (or what ever you want to throw in) and the testing end of the line will be weak.

Maybe that isn't scientific but it sure is fun and shocks a lot of people.

When I do blind testing it is mostly at workshops with strangers.

Could I manipulate the results? Yes I could. Never mind science actually shows that simple observation, never mind intention, effect out come.

Might not sound scientific but being inn a place of curiosity of the results will keep you out of screwing them up.

I can intentionally effect the test.

If i muscle test someone and simply ask in my mind for their body to show me weak, there arm goes weak (some is strong enough that they can feel the weakness before I even test or as you start to test the arm just drops) The in my mind ask to see strong and bang!

Sound fucked up? Can you back that with science? Well you are automatically getting involved. Science is under the illusion that the scientist is neutral. But Quantum mechanics shows how we interact with our environment.

Is it scratching it all out cause I can influence it by thought? Or do you ask "what the hell is going on if thought does this and what do we not know and are not taught in school?"

Get a base rate of strength, then slash your finger across the chest diagonally and test again. You'll find the subject weaker. (most will look at you like what the fuck). Tap on the thymus 10-15 times and test again and ytou will find them strong.

Can science explain it. Not reductionist Newtonian science... quantum physics has some interesting thoughts though.