I think this just highlights the problems discussed on another thread. Two well known instructors from different gyms both in the UK saying exactly the opposite about one technique. The problems of scoring and the way fighters approach fights to win isn't going to be resolved until this is sorted. Things should be scored as they are in Thailand, but then in Thailand do all judges score the same? Am I right in believing that the WMC are the most influential organisation in Muay Thai, if so do they not have written criteria for judging and scoring. The whole thing seems to be in a terrible mess at the moment and for our sport to grow it needs to be organised so that those on the inside know what is going on before anyone on the outside can understand and appreciate the art. Just my opinion